IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PRAJEESH – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks release of seized vehicle. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discretion of district collector in confiscation cases examined. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the respondents to release/return the goods carriage/lorry bearing registration No.KL-BT-5198 seized by the 3rd respondent unconditionally to the petitioner, forthwith;
ii) Declare that the seizure of the vehicle owned by the petitioner as per Exhibit P1 mahzar by the 3rd respondent is perse illegal;
iii) Dispense with the filing of English translation of Vernacular documents;
iv) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is the registered owner of a goods carriage/lorry bearing registration No.KL-BT-5198. The vehicle was hired by the owners of a steel factory by the name ‘Primo Flex’, situated at Feroke in Kozhikkode District, on 06.03.2026 is the submission. According to the petitioner, the vehicle was toppled, and the 3rd respondent came and seized the vehicle on the allegation that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.