IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
AJAYAN V.G – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to form-5 application (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding validity of ext p9 (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court confirmed ext p9 as valid (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. To issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to Ext P9 and to quash the same.
ii. To direct the respondents to ensure that the property mentioned in Ext P9 is not converted and to restore the status of the property as it was on the date of coming into force of Act 28 of 2008.
iii. To dispense with the production of English translation of Vernacular documents iv. To grant such other reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is a resident of Kumarakom Village in Kottayam Taluk in Kottayam District. He used to take paddy fields on lease and used to conduct paddy cultivation on the leased properties, is the submission. During the year 2010, the 7th respondent purchased the property in Resurvey No. 4/2-1 and 4/2-3 of Kumarakom Village admeasuring 34.61 Ares, knowing that the property is subject to all the restrictions as per the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.