IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
TOM AUGUSTIAN – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. authority must consider permit transfer applications according to prescribed rules. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. government pleader indicates application will be processed. (Para 3) |
| 3. court mandates timely orders on permit applications. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This Court, by Ext.P2 judgment, directed the
1st respondent to consider the joint application of the petitioners for transfer of regular permit on the route Kottayam - Ettumanoor in respect of stage carriage bearing Registration No.KL-05/Z-0025 and to pass orders thereon in accordance with law, either in the next RTA Board meeting or at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of that judgment.
2. Pursuant to Ext.P2, the 1st respondent issued Ext.P3 order by circulation stating that the petitioners/applicants have not submitted the statement required by Rule 178(2) of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules , 1989 making full disclosure along with the anterior agreement entered between them. It is further stated therein that the enquiry report is not complete and hence a detailed enquiry is necessary. Accordingly, the consideration of the application was adjourned by the 1st respondent. The petitioners have writ p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.