SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ABHILASH P.A. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17063 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C.K.Prasad, K.T.Divyamol
For the Respondents: M.Sasindran, Preetha K K

The court emphasizes the necessity for administrative bodies to comply with relevant rules while considering petitions related to building permits.

Headnote:This writ petition seeks to declare that the building constructed by the petitioner is entitled to the provisions of front average as per Rule 26(4) of the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2019. The court directs the Panchayat to consider the representation of the petitioner (Exhibit P11) and to pass orders in accordance with the applicable rules. The judgment concludes with a mandate for timely compliance.

Table of Content
1. petitioner requests a writ concerning building permits. (Para 1)
2. court orders consideration of the petitioner's representation. (Para 2)
3. final directions given for compliance. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayers:

“I. To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, order or directions declaring that the building constructed by the petitioner in terms of Exhibit -P2 building permit issued by the 3rd respondent is entitled for the provisions of front average as provided in Rule 26 (4) of the Kerala Panchayath Building Rules, 2019 and it’s Provisos thereunder.

II. To pass an order directing the respondents to dispose of Exhibits P10 and P11 representations lawfully after considering the grounds urged thereunder as well as in this writ petition and also by giving a fair opportunity for hearing the petitioner.

III. Issue such other Writ, Order or Direction that this Honorable Court may deems fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case. ”

2. Ext.P8 is the showcause notice issued by the 3rd respondent. Petitioner submitted Ext.P11 reply to the same. I am of the considered opinion that this Writ Petition need not be entertained. Therefore, there can be a direction to the Panchayat to consider Ext.P11 with notice to the petitioner within a time frame and also to take into consideration, the applicability of Rule 26 (4) of the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules , 2019 while deciding the matter. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

3. The 3rd respondent is directed to consider Ext.P11 and pass appropriate orders in it after giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible at any rate within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

While deciding the matter, the 3rd respondent will also consider the applicability of Rule 26 (4) of the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules , 2019. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits before the 3rd respondent for compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top