IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
JELITTA PUBLICITY – Appellant
Versus
RELIANCE HOME FINANCE LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12412 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to coercive action under the sarfaesi act expressed by petitioners. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. writ petitions against sarfaesi proceedings considered inadmissible. (Para 3) |
P.V. BALAKRISHNAN, J .…………………………................................
W.P.(C)No. 12412 of 2026 ….........................................................
Dated this the 27th day of March 2026 JUDGMENT It is aggrieved by the coercive action taken by the respondents under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘SARFAESI Act' for short), this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners on admission.
3. The Honourable Apex Court in a catena of decisions including the decisions inPhoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. v. Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir and Others [2022 KHC OnLine 6040] , South Indian Bank Ltd. (M/s.) v. Naveen Mathew Philip [2023 KHC OnLine 6435] and PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank [2024 KHC OnLine 6208], have categorically held that writ petitions against SARFAESI proceedings must not be entertained since the aggrieved persons have an alternative and efficacious remedy before the DRT.
In such circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the contentions and right of the petitioners to avail the statutory remedy.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.