SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 29458

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J
JAYADEVAN – Appellant
Versus
VISWAMBHARAN – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.S.MOHANAN SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR

JUDGMENT

The Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking the following reliefs:

“i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit P6 and quash the same as illegal and unsustainable.

ii. To direct the Munsiff's Court, Punalur to take evidence and dispose of Exhibit P5 application, I.A.No.1503/2006 in O.S.57/2000 before starting evidence in the suit.

iii. To grant such other reliefs.”

2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.57/2000, on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Punalur and the respondents are the defendants in that suit. The grievance canvassed by the petitioner is that there are patent mistakes in the report and plan submitted by the Commissioner and his request for considering the objections over the report, as a preliminary WP(C)16788./09 2 issue, has been turned down by the learned Munsiff, ordering that such objections will be considered in the trial of the suit. Exhibit P6 is the copy of the order passed by the learned Munsiff. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if a chance is given to point out the mistakes in the commission report by examining the Commi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top