HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J
JAYADEVAN – Appellant
Versus
VISWAMBHARAN – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking the following reliefs:
“i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit P6 and quash the same as illegal and unsustainable.
ii. To direct the Munsiff's Court, Punalur to take evidence and dispose of Exhibit P5 application, I.A.No.1503/2006 in O.S.57/2000 before starting evidence in the suit.
iii. To grant such other reliefs.”
2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.57/2000, on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Punalur and the respondents are the defendants in that suit. The grievance canvassed by the petitioner is that there are patent mistakes in the report and plan submitted by the Commissioner and his request for considering the objections over the report, as a preliminary WP(C)16788./09 2 issue, has been turned down by the learned Munsiff, ordering that such objections will be considered in the trial of the suit. Exhibit P6 is the copy of the order passed by the learned Munsiff. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if a chance is given to point out the mistakes in the commission report by examining the Commi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.