IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
MUHAMMED SULFI – Appellant
Versus
THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges sarfaesi coercive steps. (Para 1) |
| 2. writs against sarfaesi dismissed for drt remedy. (Para 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 6th day of April, 2026 It is aggrieved by the coercive steps taken by the respondent-bank under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘SARFAESI Act’ for short), this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on admission.
3. The Honourable Apex Court in a catena of decisions including, the decisions inPhoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. v. Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir and Others [2022 KHC OnLine 6040], South Indian Bank Ltd. (M/s.) v. Naveen Mathew Philip [ 2023 KHC OnLine 6435 ] and PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank [2024 KHC OnLine 6208], have categorically held that writ petitions against SARFAESI proceedings must not be entertained since, the aggrieved persons have an alternative and efficacious remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
In such circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the contentions and right of the petitione
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.