Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
Rema Devi – Appellant
Versus
Station House Officer Angamaly Police Station – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek police protection for compound wall construction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. heard counsel; prior stay and injunction noted. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. writ dismissed due to adverse orders; merits open. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioners seek for the following reliefs;
i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the 1st respondent to afford adequate and effective police protection to the petitioners, their life and property, and to ensure that the petitioners are are not obstructed by respondents 2 to 6 or any other persons acting under them or on their behalf, from constructing a compound wall around their property in accordance with Exhibit P11 building permit.
ii. Direct the 1st respondent to take necessary action in accordance with law on the basis of Exhibit P12 including preventing trespass, obstruction, intimidation, and threats by respondents 2 to 5 and from their men and agents.
2. On a reading of the reliefs sought for, it is evident that petitioners want to construct a compound wall based on Exhibit-P11 building permit.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the respondents as well
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
