SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 189

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.D.RAJAN, J
K.S.SHAFEEK – Appellant
Versus
N.RINSUMON – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.R.SUDHISH, SMT.M.MANJU, SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN

J U D G M E N T

The injured in O.P.(M.V.) No.2057 of 2009 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ernakulam preferred this appeal. The appellant sustained injuries in a motor accident on 25.12.2008 at 9.15 p.m., while he was travelling as a pillion rider along with 1st respondent in a motor cycle bearing registration No.KL-39/A-2246 from Chakkaraparambu to Pallimukku. When he reached at Chakkaraparambu, the motorcycle skidded off, it went out of the road and overturned. As a result, the appellant sustained serious injuries. He was treated in the Medical Trust Hospital, Ernakulam. In the trial court, the driver of the vehicle was set ex-parte. The insurance company admitted the insurance of the vehicle but filed a written statement contending that the 1st respondent is the brother-in-law of the petitioner. In support of the claim, the appellant was examined as PW1 and his documents were marked as Exts.A1 to A7. The learned Tribunal dismissed the application on the ground that the petitioner failed to prove that the aforesaid vehicle involved in a motor accident.

2. It is true that there is a delay of six months in registering the FIR. The injured filed a complaint before the Judicial

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top