SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 29104

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J
RUKIYA BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
KULUSAM BEEVI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Defendant in O.S.No.167 2007 of the court of learned Additional Munsiff-I, Neyyattinkara is the petitioner before me challenging Ext.P7, order dated July 3, 2010 on I.A.No.4166 of 2010 allowing amendment of plaint to include a prayer for declaration of title and possession. Respondent filed the suit initially seeking a decree for prohibitory injunction against petitioner trespassing into the suit property – then described as 1.10 acres. Respondent claimed title and possession as per an assignment deed executed by petitioner in respect of 1.10 acres. Petitioner filed written statement denying allegations in the plaint and making a counter claim for prohibitory injunction regarding 40 cents. Petitioner claimed that of the 1.50 acres belonging to her, she assigned 1.10 acres to the respondent. Respondent filed a replication in answer to the counter claim contending that claim of petitioner that she has 40 cents with her is not correct and that if at all she has 40 cents excluding the 1.10 acres assigned to the respondent, the latter has no objection in petitioner locating the said 40 cents. After issues were framed, respondent filed Ext.P5, application for amendment of plaint

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top