Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
VEERANKUTTY. P.T – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reliefs sought for quashing rejection of form-5 and data bank exclusion. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. authorised officer failed to consider ksrec report and statutory duties. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. set aside order; direct fresh consideration with inspection or satellite imagery. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, calling for the records leading to Exhibit P8 and quashing the rejection order dated 29.10.2025 passed by the 3rd respondent rejecting the petitioner’s Form- 5 application;
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the 3rd respondent to reconsider Exhibit P3 Form-5 application afresh, strictly in accordance with law and in the light of the KSREC report (Exhibit P6) and the law laid down by this Hon’ble Court, within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
iii. Declare that the petitioner’s property is comprised in Sy. No. 860/1-1, Kadavallur Village, Kunnamkulam Taluk, Thrissur District, is not a paddy land or wetland as defined under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, and is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
