Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
Parameswara Warrier, S/o. Neelakanda Warrier – Appellant
Versus
Power Grid Corporation Of India, New Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common issues in cross-revision petitions against compensation order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts of power line impact and lower court compensation award. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. parties' contentions on land value and diminution percentage. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. land value fixed at rs.1,25,000/- per cent per comparables. (Para 11) |
| 5. diminution enhanced to 50% per supreme court factors. (Para 12) |
| 6. interest from tree cutting; enhanced compensation ordered. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER :
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.
The Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the order dated 21.11.2016 in O.P.(Ele) No. 138 of 2011 passed by the Court of the Additional District Judge, North Paravur. Since common issues arise for consideration in these revision petitions, they are disposed of by this common order.
2. CRP No.738 of 2018 is filed by the petitioner in O.P. (Ele) No. 138 of 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) and CRP No.161 of 2023 is filed by the Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., the 1st respondent in the original petition.
3. The Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) drew 400 kV Cochin-Thrissur electric line through the property of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
