Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
SINOJ – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed to quash seizure and release jcb not used on designated wetland (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. land not included in data bank so vehicle can be conditionally released (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. third party can be exonerated from confiscation when land is not in data bank (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Issue a writ of certiorari and quash Exhibit P-2 mahazar and its all further proceedings.
ii. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release vehicle belongs to petitioner bearing registration No. KL-22-E- 7652., forthwith.
iii. Issue a Writ of mandamus or other appropriate Writ Direction or Order, declaring that the seizure of the petitioner’s vehicle effected by the 4th respondent on the basis of the Exhibit P-2 will not come under the purview of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008.
iv. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the 4th respondents to forward entire report to the 1st respondent with respect to the seizure of the petitioner vehicle on the basis of the Exhibit P-2 mahazar forthwith, if it is not already forwarded and direct the 1st respondent to release the petitioner’s vehicle on inter
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
