IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Harisankar V. Menon, J
Easwara Vilasam U.P. School – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4149 OF 2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts regarding appointment dispute between candidates and retirement of the senior respondent. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court directs reconsideration of appointment based on prospective application of qualification norms. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri.Rajesh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.
Sri.N.B.Sunil Nath, the learned Government Pleader, as well as Sri.Sasthamangalam Ajith Kumar, the learned Senior Counsel for the 5th respondent.
2. The 1st petitioner is the Manager of the school and the 2nd petitioner is the Head Teacher appointed by the 1st petitioner in the school. The short issue arising for consideration is as to whether the 1st petitioner is justified in appointing the 2nd petitioner as the Head Teacher, as against the claim made by the 5th respondent herein. Admittedly, the 5th respondent has retired from the service on 31.05.2025. By the impugned order at Ext.P10, the 1st petitioner has been directed to appoint the 5th respondent as the Head Teacher. However, status quo as regards the appointment of the 2nd petitioner is being continued.
3. In the meantime, as noticed earlier, the 5th respondent has retired from service on 31.05.2025.
4. Therefore, the claim of the 2nd petitioner requires to be considered, especially when the 2nd petitioner has a case that she has subsequently acquired the required qualification. This is all the more so in view of the judgment of this Court in Venugopalan H. v. District Educational Officer, Palakkad [2025 KHC OnLine 258], as per which, the requirement for obtaining the test qualification was declared to only have prospective operation.
5. In such circumstances, this writ petition would stand ordered directing the 3rd respondent to consider the claim made by the 2nd petitioner herein as well as similarly placed claimants, if any, specifically taking note of the dictum laid down by this Court in Venugopalan (supra) as well as the subsequent acquisition of the required qualification by the 2nd petitioner herein. Needful to be done in the matter as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from today.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.