Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.Kunhikrishnan, J
Shafeek Y – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the dispute involving illegal reclamation and vehicle seizure. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. interpretation of section 20 of the act regarding the discretion of the collector in vehicle confiscation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. conditions for the interim release of the vehicle pending final adjudication. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
1. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction by calling for the records relating to the seizure of the petitioner’s vehicle bearing Registration KL-49-A 6913 by the second respondent as per Exhibit P2 mahazar and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable in law.
2. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to release the petitioner’s vehicle bearing Registration KL-49-A 6913 forthwith to the petitioner.
3. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the first respondent to consider and finalize the adjudication proceedings under Section 21 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 within a time limit as may be fixed by this Honourable Court.
4. Declare t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
