Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.Kunhikrishnan, J
Sundaran K – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks release of vehicle seized for alleged illegal earth mining. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. interpretation of section 20 of the kerala conservation of paddy land and wetland act, 2008 regarding vehicle release. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court ordered conditional release of the seized vehicle. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. Issue a writ of certiorari and quash Exhibit P-2 mahazar and its all further proceedings.
ii. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release vehicle belongs to petitioner bearing registration No. KL-44-1549, forthwith.
iii. Issue a Writ of mandamus or other appropriate Writ Direction or Order, declaring that the seizure of the petitioner’s vehicle affected by the 2nd respondent on the basis of the Exhibit P-2 will not come under the purview of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008.
iv. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to finalize the proceedings pursuant to Exhibit P-2 mahazar within a time limit after hearing the petitioner.
v. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to release the petitioner’s vehicle on interim custody.
vi. To dispe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
