SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 762

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
M.V.Justin, S/o.Varghese – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Represented By Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Bail Appl. No. 2376 of 2026
Decided On : 26-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri.P.Vijaya Bhanu (Sr.) Shri.K.Aravind Menon Sri.P.M.Rafiq Sri.Ajeesh K.Sasi Smt.Sruthy K.K Sruthy N. Bhat Shri.Aaron Zacharias Benny Smt.Sona Maria Biju
For the Respondent: Sr.Public Prosecutor Sri.C.K Suresh, Sr.Public Prosecutor Smt.Rekha.S, Spl.Public Prosecutor Sri.Rajesh.A

Anticipatory bail is not maintainable in cases of serious economic offenses involving conspiracy and large-scale misappropriation of funds where custodial interrogation is required and there are no significant changes in circumstances since a prior rejection.

Headnote:The case involves a second application for anticipatory bail under S.482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by individuals accused of conspiracy, forgery, and misappropriation of loan funds totaling ₹3 Crore from a Society involving multiple criminal cases. The court examined whether there were any changed circumstances justifying a departure from its previous order refusing bail. The court noted that custodial interrogation and recovery of funds remain essential to the investigation. The primary issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to anticipatory bail despite grave allegations of financial fraud and the existence of multiple criminal cases (totaling 20) against them. The court reasoned that partial repayment of misappropriated funds does not absolve criminal liability, particularly in a large-scale scam, and that the absence of substantial change in circumstances precluded a grant of relief. The application for anticipatory bail stands dismissed, with a direction to the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer.

Table of Content
1. rejection of anticipatory bail in serious economic offences where conditions have not changed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)

ORDER :

A. BADHARUDEEN, J.

This is the 2nd application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sasnhita, 2023, by the petitioners, who are accused Nos.24 to 26 in Crime No.252/2021 of Crime Branch Economic Offences Wing, Thrissur.

2. Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Here, the prosecution allegation is that, accused Nos.1 to 31 have committed offences punishable under Sections 120B , 406, 409, 465, 468, 471 and 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 13(1)(c) and (d) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 13(1)(a) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018.

4. The prosecution case is that the accused herein hatched conspiracy and as an outcome of the same, they have obtained membership bearing No.18637 in the name of the complainant and thereafter, by using forged documents by providing the property of the 1st accused, a sum of Rs. 25 lakh was granted as loan vide SLM No.3929 dated 16.07.2011. Subsequently, in the same mode, on 27.03.2014, SLM No.4589 for Rs. 25 lakh; on 09.03.2015, SLM No.4843 for Rs. 50 lakh; on 26.03.2016, SLM No.5180 for Rs. 50 lakh; on 20.03.2017, SLM No.5495 for Rs. 50 lakh; on 31.03.2018, SLM No.5940 for Rs. 50 lakh; and on 11.11.2014, vide BOD No.744 for Rs. 50 lakh, were obtained, and the accused persons misappropriated the same through RUBCO. Thus, misappropriation of the principal amount of Rs. 3 Crore, along with accrued interest is involved in the case. In this connection, the complainant Sri.Muhammed Abdul Riyas filed a complaint before the Vigilance and crime was registered.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out the age of the accused persons while canvassing anticipatory bail. According to him, the petitioners are innocent and they are ready to co-operate with the investigation.

6. The learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that the allegations against them are grave and that their arrest, custodial interrogation, taking of specimen signatures, and recovery of the money are necessary, and in such circumstances, the grant of anticipatory bail would impede the investigation.

7. In this matter, earlier, the petitioners herein have filed B.A.No.13738/2025 seeking anticipatory bail and as per Annexure 2 order dated 02.12.2025, this Court dismissed the said bail application mainly on the ground that arrest, custodial interrogation, and collection of specimen signatures were necessary for the purpose of investigation and alleged recovery of details relating to the misappropriation, with direction to the petitioners/accused to surrender before the Investigating Officer forthwith. Paragraph Nos.3 to 9 of B.A.No.13738/2025 are relevant and are extracted as under:

3. Here, the prosecution allegation is that, accused Nos.1 to 31 have committed offences punishable under Sections 120B , 406, 409, 465, 468, 471 and 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘the IPC’ hereinafter) and under Sections 13(1)(c) and (d) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the PC Act, 1988’ hereinafter) and Section 13(1)(a) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 (for short, ‘the PC (Amendment) Act, 2018’ hereinafter).

4. The prosecution case is that the accused herein hatched conspiracy and as an outcome of the same, they have obtained membership bearing No.18637 in the name of the complainant and thereafter, by using forged documents by providing the property of the 1st accused, a sum of Rs. 25 lakh was granted as loan vide SLM No.3929 dated 16.07.2011. Subsequently, in the same mode, on 27.03.2014, SLM No.4589 for Rs. 25 lakh; on 09.03.20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top