IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
Prakasan K.V. – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to revenue recovery proceedings based on the limitation period. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. a time-barred debt cannot be recovered using the revenue recovery act. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is the power of attorney holder of Sri.Rajesh K.G., and challenges the revenue recovery proceedings initiated as per Ext.P2 and Ext.P3 initiated against the said Rajesh.
2. According to the petitioner, Sri.Rajesh K.G.-the executant of the attorney, had availed a loan under the Central Government Scheme by name PMRY [Prime Ministers Rozgar Yojana] for an amount of Rs.50,000/- on 01.07.1997 from the erstwhile State Bank of Travancore [for short, ‘SBT’]. Petitioner alleges that, though irregular, Sri.Rajesh K.G., had remitted the entire loan amount in time and the loan period itself was completed on 01.07.2004. It is stated that the Bank had even intimated that the entire amount availed as loan was fully written off, in accordance with the Scheme announced by the Central Government and the list of beneficiaries whose PMRY loan were written off was published in the notice board. Thereafter, from 01.07.2004 till the end of August 2018, no amounts were demanded, nor was the loa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.