Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. Girish, J
Kunhammad Haji – Appellant
Versus
C.P. Noushad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. concurrent findings on facts regarding cheque dishonour liability should not be disturbed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. revisional jurisdiction is limited and intended only to correct perversity or jurisdictional errors. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the accused in S.T No.15/2022 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Nadapuram. He was convicted and sentenced by the learned Magistrate under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, to undergo imprisonment till the rising of Court, and to pay fine Rs.3,68,00,000/- with a default clause of simple imprisonment for six months. In the appeal filed before the Additional Sessions Court, Vatakara, the aforesaid conviction was confirmed. While retaining the sentence of imprisonment till rising of Court, the Appellate Court reduced the fine amount to Rs.2,62,66,000/-. The aforesaid verdicts of the Courts below are under challenge in this revision petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the learned counsel for the first respondent, and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.
3. The case relates to the dishonour of three cheques issued by the petitioner to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
