IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. Girish, J
Anilkumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests time-bound disposal of criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. constitutional courts should generally avoid prescribing case-specific time limits. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. long-pending cases warrant priority without strict time-bound mandates. (Para 5) |
OTHER PRESENT:
SR. PP. SRI. GITHESH.R
THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.06.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The accused in C.C.No.86/2017 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta, has filed this original petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for a direction to the said court for the disposal of the above case, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.
3. As per the judgment rendered in Allahabad High Court Bar Association v. State of U.P. and Others [2024 (6) SCC 267], the Hon’ble Supreme Court has cautioned the constitutional courts from prescribing time limits for the disposal of the cases pending before the courts below, unless there are compelling reasons to adopt such a course.
4. Par
Allahabad High Court Bar Association v. State of U.P. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.