SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 169

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, ABHAY S. OKA, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA, PANKAJ MITHAL
High Court Bar Association, Allahabad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

(Abhay S. Oka, J.) :

Table of Contents

A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

I. Directions in Asian Resurfacing

II. Order of reference to Larger Bench

B. SUBMISSIONS

C. ANALYSIS

I. Object of passing interim orders

II. High Court’s power to vacate or modify interim relief

III. Whether an interim order can come to an end automatically only due to the lapse of time

IV. Scope of exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution

V. Position of High Courts and its power of superintendence

VI. Whether the Court should deal with an issue not arising for consideration

VII. Clause (3) of Article 226 of the Constitution

VIII. Directions issued by the constitutional Courts to decide pending cases in a time-bound manner

IX. Procedure to be adopted by High Courts while passing interim order of stay of proceedings and for dealing with the applications for vacating interim stay

D. CONCLUSIONS

A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

By the order dated 1st December 2023, a Bench of three Hon’ble Judges of this Court expressed a view that a decision of this Court in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Age

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top