Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, V.SIVAGNANAM, JJ
Jaffer Sadiq – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai Zonal Unit – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the parties involved and the prayer for quashment. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's argument against arrest order violations. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. court’s reference to supreme court interpretation of pmla. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 4. counterarguments from the respondent regarding arrest within legal framework. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. legal procedure compliance under section 19 of pmla. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. conclusion of the court regarding the dismissal of the petition. (Para 11) |
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
Under assail is the order dated 26.06.2024 passed by Shri Sunil Shankar Yadav, Assistant Director in File No.ECIR/CEZO-1/09/2024, on the file of the Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai Zonal Unit-1.
2.The criminal original petition has been instituted under Section 482 of Cr.P.C . to quash the arrest order dated 26.06.2024. The learned Senior Counsel Mr.Abdulkumar Rajarathinam appearing on behalf of the petitioner would mainly contend that the impugned arrest order is directly in violation of Section 19 (3) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred as PMLA). It is contended that the petitioner was formally arrested
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
