SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18834

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
M/s.Motorola Mobility (Chennai)Pvt Ltd – Appellant
Versus
State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Na – Respondent


ORDER

The facts of the case are summarized as follows: Motorola India Private Limited (MIPL) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the MoU) with the Government of Tamil Nadu/second respondent on 07.06.2006 to invest USD 30 million for establishing a manufacturing facility to produce various telecommunication equipments and products and undertake software development, trading, systems integration and logistics activities and for provision of engineering and IT-enabled services within three years of signing of the MoU. Subsequently, on 12.06.2006, the second respondent issued G.O. (Ms.) No.58 Industries (MIB.1) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu dated 12.06.2006 (GO Ms. No.58) approving MIPL's proposal and provided exemption from the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax (TNGST) and Central Sales Tax (CST) for 5 years on the first sale to the Domestic Tariff Area(DTA). On 12.09.2006, SIPCOT/the first respondent issued the Allotment Order whereby MIPL was allocated 70 acres in the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) to establish the manufacturing facility with a lease period of 99 years. MIPL commenced operations from 04.02.2008. The MoU imposed a minimum investment obligation of Rs.135 crore

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top