SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 27356

MADRAS HIGH COURT
T.Govindarajan, Token No.850, – Appellant
Versus
The Official Liquidator, – Respondent


Comp.A.No.155 of 2023

Comp.A.No.155 of 2023

in C.P.No.378 of 1997

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

This application was filed to set aside the adjudication order dated

18.01.2008 in Claim No.260/201/2001/CRS 0850 so far as the rejection of the

claim of arrears of V Pay Commission and bonus and direct the respondent to

pay the V Pay Commission arrears and bonus to the applicant.

2. The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant

had filed a claim application claiming VRS compensation, 11 months salary and

arrears of V Pay Commission and bonus, which was registered as Claim

No.260/201/2001/CRS 0850. Further he submitted that the said claim was

adjudicated by the learned Official Liquidator admitting the amount of

Rs.1,05,968/- out of Rs.1,69,000/- and rejected a sum of Rs.63,032/- towards

the arrears of V Pay Commission and Bonus. The said adjudication order was

communicated to the applicant on 18.01.2008.

3. Further it was submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that

since the learned Official Liquidator assured that the payment of arrears of V

Pay Commission, which was rejected vide order dated 18.01.2008, will be pai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top