SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 40074

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
M.Nirmal Kumar, J
Mahalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.A.Jayaramachandran For R1 : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner/A5 filed the Criminal Original Petition seeking to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.124 of 2022, for the offences under Sections 143, 341 and 291 I.P.C. and Section 71A(1) of the Tamil Nadu City Police Act , 1888, on the file of the first respondent Police.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 31.03.2022 at about 04.00 p.m., the respondent Police was on patrol duty, at that time, one Fathima Kani, State Secretary of Woman India Movement and other Organizations like, NWF along with other political parties, had formed an unlawful assembly in the busy public area and raised slogans in a stage against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court, banning of wearing Hijab at the Educational Institution and caused disturbance to the Public at large. Hence, the complaint has been lodged against the petitioner and others.

3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and no prima facie case has been made out as against the petitioner to invoke Sections 143, 341 and 291 I.P.C. and Section 71A(1) of the Tamil Nadu City Police Act , 1888. He further submitted that the petitioner and others had only ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top