Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
R.SUBRAMANIAN, N.SENTHILKUMAR, JJ
M/s.Ramar Coir Industries Represented by its Managing Partner, Mr.K.R.Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
Dhana Natarajan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of partnership firm and disputes (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendants' arguments against dissolution (Para 5 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. trial court's findings and conclusions (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. statutory rights of partners under partnership act (Para 20 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. entitlement to dissolve partnership at will (Para 29 , 30) |
| 6. judicial precedent affirming partner's dissolution rights (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 35) |
| 7. findings on mismanagement and exclusion (Para 40 , 42) |
| 8. affirmation of trial court's judgment (Para 43) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)
This appeal was originally filed by the defendants 1 to 3 in O.S.No.719 of 2011 on the file of the V-Additional District Judge, Coimbatore, a suit for dissolution of the 1st defendant firm at the instance of one of its partners, the plaintiff.
2.Since the second appellant died pending appeal, his legal representatives were brought on record as appellants 4 to 6. The parties will be referred as per their rank in the Trial Court for the purposes of convenience.
3.The plaintiff sued for dissolution of the 1st defendant firm contending that the defendants 2 and 3, who were
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
