Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
Madhu Gulrajani – Appellant
Versus
State represented by Inspector of Police, W-8 AWPS, Thirumangalam, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of case details and parties involved (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against further investigation initiated by the accused (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on judicial discretion and principles governing further investigation (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. accused's arguments regarding the motivations behind the complaint and admissibility of foreign documents (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court citations to support the validity of the trial court's order for further investigation (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. determination of the legality of the trial court's order in light of previous judgments (Para 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. conclusion affirming the validity of the criminal revision (Para 19 , 22) |
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 21.04.2023 in Crl.M.P.No.1617 of 2022 in Spl.S.C.No.31 of 2021 in Cr.No.20 of 2020 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Chennai.
2.The petitioner/de-facto complainant, on whose complaint a case in Crime No.20 of 2020 registered by the first respondent against the second respondent and on completion of investigation, charge sheet filed i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
