IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Manonamani – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. By The Sub Inspector of Police, Salem District Crime Branch Police Station, Salem District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case and parties involved (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding evidence and appreciation (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
O R D E R
This Criminal Revision Case had been filed against the Judgment dated
30.01.2019 passed in Crl.A.No.76 of 2017 by the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem dismissing the Appeal and confirming the Judgment of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Omalur in C.C.No.151 of 2010, dated 14.06.2017.
2. The brief facts, which are relevant for consideration of this Criminal Revision Case, are as follows:
3.1. The dispute is with regard to the agricultural land in S.No.80/4 of Ammanichikkanampatti Village within Omalur Taluk. The first Appellant before the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, is the first Accused before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Omalur. The first Accused is the mother of the second Accused. Third Accused is the son of the second Accused. Fifth and Sixth Accused are the sons of the fourth Accused. Accused 9 to 11 are the purchasers of the property, who had purchased the said land from the Accused 1 to 8. The Accused 1 to 8 had sold the agricultural land in S.No.80/4 an extent of 2 Acres in the said Vi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.