Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup, J
Pratima Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Medavakkam Ishwarya Homes Apartment Owners Association – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and disputes over property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 18) |
| 2. arguments on the merits of the claims and res judicata. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's analysis of the arguments and application of law. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. differing causes of action between the two suits. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. application of relevant case law to the current case. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 6. final considerations and reinforcement of earlier decisions. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. conclusion and order of dismissal. (Para 41) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the Defendants in O.S.No.180 of 2018 challenging the order dated 03.12.2019 passed in I.A.No.992 of 2018 in O.S.No.180 of 2018 by the learned Additional District Munsif, Alandur.
2.The learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioners submitted that the Petitioners had been the Defendants 1 to 3 in the earlier suit in O.S.No.835 of 2011 filed by the then President of the Medavakkam Panchayat for declaration to declare that the suit property is 16 feet Road and consequential injunction restraining the Defendants 1 to 3 from interfe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
