Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Not specified, Not specified
Shebik – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction and background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecution's evidence and trial outcome. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments from the appellant and prosecution. (Para 8) |
| 4. court's analysis of compliance with ndps act. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. legal interpretations and implications of ndps act. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
The accused No.2 in C.C.No.245 of 2022 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukkottai, has filed this Criminal Appeal before this Court challenging the conviction and sentence imposed against him in the impugned judgment dated 05.05.2023. The conviction and sentence is as follows:
2. On 02.04.2022 at about 15 hours, P.W.8 received the secret information about the illegal transportation of 1.030 Kgs of Hashish oil. Thereafter, he reduced the same in writing and sent the same to his superior under Ex.P.7 in compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act. After getting permission, he along with his team, namely, P.W.1 and P.W.2 went to the scene of the occurrence. The informer identified the accused Nos.1 and 2 and on seeing the team, the appellant and the other accused, Mohammed Ja
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
