Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. BALAJI, J
Moolam Thirunal Ramavarma by his Power of Attorney, Adithya Varma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By its Principal Secretary of Revenue Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed regarding ownership of courtallam palace. (Para 1 , 21) |
| 2. arguments presented by petitioner on title and patta transfer. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. state's position on property ownership and covenant compliance. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 4. court's analysis of property ownership and legal standing. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed; no merit found. (Para 28 , 29) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed by the descendents of the Maharaja of Travancore, challenging the order of the District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District, dated 25.09.2018. The petitioner also consequently seeks restoration of the name of Maharaja of Travancore, to an extent of 56.68 Acres, in the revenue records.
2. I have heard Mr.S.Prabakaran, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.MA.Gouthaman, for the petitioner; Mr.Gopala Krishna Kurup, learned Advocate General, State of Kerala, for Mr.S.Anwar Sameem and Mr.K.Pradap Sudarsan for the respondents 2 and 5; and Mr.B.Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1,3,4,6 and 7.
3. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.S.Prabakaran, would first and foremost invite my attenti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
