Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J
R.Radha – Appellant
Versus
The State, Represented by the Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. notices issued under government order (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners challenging rent increases (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. applicability of interim orders in state matters (Para 5 , 6 , 18) |
| 4. mandatory nature of article 226(3) (Para 7 , 16) |
| 5. judicial responsibility regarding interim orders (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 6. concerns over administrative delays (Para 13 , 15) |
| 7. clarification of stay order's applicability (Para 17 , 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. upheld validity of government's rent revision order (Para 23 , 24 , 27) |
| 9. writ petitions dismissed; payment of revised rent mandatory (Para 28 , 30) |
COMMON ORDER
The notices issued to the petitioners dated 25.10.2021 issued by the Commissioner, Coonoor Municipality are under challenge in the present writ petitions.
2. The impugned notices were issued based on the Government Order issued in G.O.Ms.No.92, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department dated 03.07.2007 and based on the resolution passed by the Municipal Council on 15.02.2021.
3. In respect of W.P.No.10599 of 2023, the petitioner states that she is a licensee of a shop bearing No.505 belonging to Coonoor Municipality and the monthly rent for the said shop during the year
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
