Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice N. ANAND VENKATESH
The petitioner – Appellant
Versus
2nd respondent – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of property and patta issuance details (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 8) |
| 2. arguments against the impugned order and limitation issue (Para 4 , 5 , 14 , 16) |
| 3. statutory powers, appeal remedy, and limitation analysis (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. core ratio on the invalidity of suo-motu revision where appeal exists (Para 19) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 20.01.2023.
2. The case of the petitioner is that on 15.03.1971, the father of the petitioner purchased the subject property from one Perumal Naicker through a registered sale deed. Thereafter, Settlement Officer issued a notice dated 24.01.1973 under Act 30 of 1963 and through proceedings dated 24.12.1999, the Assistant Settlement Officer, Thiruvannamalai, primarily issued patta in favour of the father of the petitioners. Pursuant to the same, on 10.07.2000, the father of the petitioners executed a sale deed in favour of the Government of Tamil Nadu, which was registered as Document No.1577 of 2000 and a portion of the property was conveyed for the purpose of a inner ring road. Thereafter, a claim was made over the property by fil
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
