IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
Latha @ Prakashi Jenita – Appellant
Versus
State Rep By Inspector of Police, Tambaram City CCB, Tambaram District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of offences and complainant's allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's rationale on fir sufficiency and investigative requirements (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. directions regarding investigation and final ruling (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the FIR registered in Crime No.19 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, for the offences under Sections 120B , 408, 420 r/w
506(i) of IPC .
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant alleged that all the accused persons had held out a promise that they would induct her as a partner in the 5th accused partnership firm and as her capital, she was required to pitch in a substantial amount. Pursuant to this, a sum of Rs.1,57,62,500/- was transferred from the defacto complainant's bank account to the account of the accused. In total a sum of Rs.2,07,62,500/- was paid. Apart from the bank transactions, the accused had also executed promissory notes for a valur of Rs.50,00,000/-. However, despite the promise, the defacto complainant was not inducted as a partner in the firm. The money paid by her was also not returned to her. The entire dispute revolves
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.