Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
Satheesh – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police Oradagam Police Station, Kancheepuram District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial filing and jurisdictional premise for quashing (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. summary of the fir and allegations (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's view on fir specifics and investigation necessity (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. supreme court guidance on quashing and relevance of investigation (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final ruling and directive for investigation completion (Para 9 , 10) |
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the FIR registered in Crime No.658 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent for the offence under Section 306 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sahita, 2023.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent. Perused the materials available on record.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused committed theft of 40 track rollers used in the manufacture of Hydraulic Excavator. Hence, this case.
4. Based on the complaint, the first respondent registered an FIR in Crime No.658 of 2024 for the offence under Section 306 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
5. It is seen from the records there are specific allegation as against the petitioner in orde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
