IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
Seenivasan – Appellant
Versus
The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chidambaram Town Police Station, Cuddalore District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. possession of prohibited items leads to fir. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. ongoing investigation must be respected. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. fir discloses prima facie cognizable offence. (Para 6) |
| 4. court's directive on quashing fir proceedings. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. criminal original petition dismissed. (Para 9) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.12385 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.8216 of 2025 Seenivasan ... Petitioner Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chidambaram Town Police Station, Cuddalore District. (Cr.No.260/23) ... Respondent Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., to call for the records relating to the first information report in Crime No.260 of 2023 dated 07.08.2023 pending investigation on the file of the respondent/Police and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Murugan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
This petition has been filed to quash the first information report in Crime No.260 of 2023 dated 07.08.2023 pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons we
Sau. Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.