SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23978

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
M/S.14 REELS ENTERTAINMENT P – Appellant
Versus
M/s EROS International Media – Respondent


ORDER

A Telugu feature film titled '1-Nenokkadine' is the fulcrum of lis between adversaries herein and the same shall hereinafter be referred to as 'said movie' for the sake of convenience and clarity. Another Telugu feature film titled 'Dookudu' also has a role in the transaction between the parties herein and therefore, the same shall be referred to as 'another movie' for the sake of convenience and clarity. A Film Distribution Agreement dated 20.12.2013 {Ex.C3 before Arbitral Tribunal} (hereinafter referred to as 'said agreement') is the nucleus around which lis revolves and therefore, said agreement can be described as epicentre of this case. As a sequel to some of the rights and obligations of the parties under said agreement, another 'agreement dated 17.10.2015' {Ex.C15 before Arbitral Tribunal} pertaining to another movie was entered into and this shall hereinafter be referred to as 'another agreement' for the sake of convenience and clarity.

2. There is no disputation or disagreement before me that there is an arbitration agreement being arbitration agreement within the meaning of Section 2 (1)(b) read with Section 7 of ' The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act 26

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top