Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J
The writ petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Postal Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts on appointment and termination (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties' contentions on entitlement to regularization (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court analysis on legal principles governing regularization and relevance of uma devi case (Para 6) |
| 4. final conclusion dismissing writ petition and setting aside tribunal order (Para 7 , 8) |
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
The writ petition has been instituted challenging the order dated 17.07.2023 passed in O.A.No.1460/2017 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai.
2. The writ petitioner instituted Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal challenging the order of termination and for a direction to re-instate in service and regularize the writ petitioner as GDS deliverer with all monetary benefits. The Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed the Original Application, which resulted in filing of the present writ petition by the Original Applicant.
3. The facts not disputed are that the petitioner was appointed as mail messenger/GDS deliverer in the postal department on temporary basis. In the year 2016 from January to August 2016, the petitioner served as mail messenger a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
