Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.POORNIMA, J
Velmurugan – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments presented by the parties (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. prosecution's case based on circumstantial evidence (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. evidence supporting motive for the crime (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. witness testimonies and their credibility (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. court's analysis of evidence and arguments (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. legal principles regarding burden of proof (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. final judgment and conclusions of the court (Para 40 , 41) |
(Judgment of this Court was delivered by R.POORNIMA, J.
These Criminal Appeals are filed against the conviction and sentence passed against the appellants/accused No.1 and 2 in the judgment dated 18.03.2020 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram in S.C.No.35 of 2019 by convicting and sentencing the appellants for the offence punishable under Section 302 and 449 IPC . A1 and A2 had been convicted for offence punishable under and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- each in default to undergo one year simple imprisonment each. A2 had
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
