Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
Inba @ Inbamathivathanan – Appellant
Versus
State by Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Avadi, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fir details the allegations against petitioners. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court discusses procedural aspects of the investigation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. allegations necessitate further investigation. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal precedents guide court's decisions on firs. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court denies quashing of the fir and directs investigation. (Para 10) |
C O M M O N O R D E R
These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.25 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent Police.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the property bearing Plot Nos.264 and 265, situated at Sri Lakshmi Amman Nagar, Puthagaram Village, Saidapet Taluk, Chengalpet District, measuring an extent of 4800 sq.ft., is owned by one Rajan Chacko. The petitioners, along with other persons, impersonated the original owner of the property and executed a power of attorney in favor of one Arivunidhi. These persons sold the property on the strength of the power of attorney.
2.1. It is the further case of the prosecution that originally a complaint was lodged by the original owner's legal heir's power agent, one Ajayponmany and the same was registered in Crime No. 84 of 2021
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
