IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.Lakshmi Narayanan, D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, JJ
1st petitioner – Appellant
Versus
respondents 1 to 6 – Respondent
ORDER
Through the present civil revision, the petitioner seeks the indulgence of this Court to strike off the plaint presented by the respondents herein/plaintiffs therein in O.S. No.37 of 2024, before the Principal District Judge, Dindigul, is an abuse of process of the court and as being barred under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 (for short ‘the Act’).
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of this revision petition are as under :-
Respondents 1 to 6 herein, who are the plaintiffs 1 to 6 in the suit, claim their right over the disputed property through their predecessor-in-title, viz., Vellaichamy Gounder @ Chinathambi Gounder, the lessee, under a registered sale deed dated 28.5.1908.
3. It is the case of respondents 1 to 6 in the aforesaid suit that the said property was, to a large extent, a vacant land to an extent of 2250 sq.ft., which belonged to the 1st petitioner herein with a dilapidated mud structure, which was leased out to the said Vellaichamy Gounder through Registered Document No. 310/1908 dated 28.5.1908 at a yearly rent of Rs.15/-. It is the further averment in the plaint that right was granted to the lessee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.