Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
Varadarajan Kidambi @ Raj Kidambi – Appellant
Versus
State Rep by its Inspector of Police, J-3 Guindy Police Station (Crime) Chennai. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial criminal complaint and registration of fir related to misappropriation. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. judicial scrutiny for taking cognizance needs to be evident. (Para 4 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. the legal sufficiency of evidence necessitating cognizance isn't exhaustive. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 4. evidence of serious violations during tenure of the petitioner established prima facie. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. final verdict supporting trial court's application of law without further scrutiny. (Para 15 , 16) |
O R D E R
This Criminal Revision has been filed as against the order of taking cognizance dated 23.09.2024 in C.C.No.1979 of 2024 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai.
2. The case of the prosecution is that, based on the complaint lodged by the second respondent, the first respondent registered an FIR in Crime No.578 of 2022 pursuant to the direction issued by the learned Magistrate under Section 156(3) of Criminal Procedure Code, alleging that the dishonest misappropriation of statutory documents belonging to Ayan Tech Solutions Pvt. Ltd, viz., the second respondent herein. It is further alleged that the promoter group entered into a strategic equity transfer agreement, thro
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
