Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
Chandra – Appellant
Versus
A.Murugan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. disputed claims regarding sale deed and possession. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. evidence presented by both parties. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 4. appellate issues and legal questions framed. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. arguments presented by the appellant. (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. defendant's arguments and claims. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. rejoinder by appellant's counsel. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. court's observations and evidence review. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 9. analysis of the trial court's judgment. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. appellate court's reasoning and findings. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 11. final court's decision on the matter. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 12. legal principles and rulings applied. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 13. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 14. final ruling and directive. (Para 42) |
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 18.03.2013 in A.S.No.90 of 2011 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Kanchipuram by confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 06.08.2011 in O.S.No.455 of 2006 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Kanchipuram.
2. The second Plaintif
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
