Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V. Thamilselvi, J
Alamelu – Appellant
Versus
Jayaraman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeals and factual background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. claims and counterclaims regarding property ownership. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. trial court findings on property ownership. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. appellate court confirmation of trial court's findings. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. legal arguments presented by appellants. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. discussions on the validity of the will. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 7. conclusion on the will's validity and property ownership. (Para 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 8. final judgment on property distribution. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 9. final decree and order for property possession. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
The appellants have preferred these Second Appeals against the Judgment and decree dated 31.07.2001, passed in A.S.Nos.159 & 160 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruvannamalai in confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.08.1999 passed in O.S.No.218 of 1994 & 274 of 1998, respectively on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai.
2. For the purpose of convenience, the par
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
