Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
S.Mahalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman The State Legal Service Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to lok adalat award (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. dispute regarding joint memo signing (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. counter by respondents on understanding settlement (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. responsibilities of lok adalat members (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. critique of lok adalat award drafting (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
For Petitioners :: Mrs.S.Dhanalakshmi For Respondents :: Mr.E.V.Chandru @ Chandrasekaran for R1 to R3 Mr.J.Vinoth for R4 to R6 ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the Lok Adalat award held on 09.09.2023 in O.S.No.10 of 2019, L.A.No.209 of 2023.
2. The case of the petitioners is that the first petitioner's husband, Saravana Kumar was settled half share in the suit property by his grandfather Govindhan, by virtue of a registered settlement deed dated 06.07.2009 registered as Document No.2782 of 2009. The other half share was settled in favour of the sixth respondent, who is the brother of the said Saravana Kumar. The first petitioner's husband Saravana Kumar died on
04.12.2017. Since the property remained undivided, the petitioners filed a suit in O.S.No.10 of 2019 before the Sub Court, Attur seeking for the relief of partition. In this suit, the fourth respondent, who is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
