Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Sundar, Hemant Chandangoudar, JJ
R. Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Namakkal District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition's purpose regarding notice and restoration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. advocates' presence and parties' roles. (Para 3) |
| 3. procedure under tamil nadu land encroachment act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. self-contained code reasoning. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final decision on the writ petition. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
[made by M.SUNDAR, J.]
Captioned 'writ petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity]
has been filed with a prayer for issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus.
2. The certiorari limb of the prayer is a challenge to 'a notice dated 10.08.2021 issued by R4 (Panchayat President, Thengalpalayam Panchayat, Vennandhur Panchayat Union, Rasipuram, Namakkal District)' [hereinafter 'impugned notice' for the sake of convenience and clarity]. The mandamus limb pertains to 'Survey No.17/3 in Thengalpalayam Village, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District' [hereinafter 'said property' for the sake of convenience and clarity] which according to the writ petitioner, is a well and vari vaikkal (water body) and the mandamus plea is a direction to revamp and restore the water body.
3. Mr. K.R. Samratt, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, Mr. T.K. Saravanan, learned Additional Gove
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
