Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI, J
P.Shanmugam – Appellant
Versus
P.Sampath – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff seeks partition based on defendant's known admissions. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. background on plaintiff's petition for partition. (Para 2) |
| 3. respondent counters with procedural delays presented in the court. (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. court determined admissions under rule 6 allow expedited relief. (Para 8 , 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. court's assessment of admissions and application of rule 6. (Para 11) |
| 6. summarized outcome granting judgment based on admissions. (Para 16) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on: 12.06.2025 Pronounced on: 19.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP. PD. No. 2500 of 2024 and CMP. Nos.13150 & 13151 of 2024 P.Shanmugam Petitioner(s)
Vs P.Sampath Respondent(s)
PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order and decree made in I.A. No.5 of 2024 in O.S. No.20 of 2021 dated 18.04.2024 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge FTC, Arani, Thiruvannamalai District.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthilnathan For Respondent : Mr.R.Chandrasekar **********
ORDER
The plaintiff in a suit for partition and separate possession, aggrieved by the order of dismissal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
