Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, J
S.Sharmila – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Inspector of Police (Crime) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed to expedite trial proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. high courts advised against routine time limits for trial courts. (Para 3) |
| 3. court refrains from fixing time frames, emphasizes discretion of trial courts. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. trial court directed to expedite case without fixed time. (Para 6) |
| 5. outcome of the petition is a disposal of the case. (Para 7) |
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the Judicial Magistrate-II, Tiruvallur to expedite the trial in C.C.No.631 of 2023 and Crl.MP.No.12101 of 2024 and dispose of the same within a stipulated time.
2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
3. It is pertinent to state that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has already given a directions to the High Courts not to give directions to the trial Court fixing specific time limit for disposal of cases in a routine manner and pressurise the trial Court to give priority to a particular case.
4. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case ofSangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi Vs. The State of Maharashtra inCriminal Appeal No.4758 of 2024 dated 25.11.2024 has observed that the High Courts are fixing a time- bound schedule for conclu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
