Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. A.D. Maria Clete, J
1.Amirtham, W/o.James, Door No.29, Bharathi Main Road, Thyagaraja Nagar, Theni Town, Theni Taluk, Theni District. – Appellant
Versus
1.Senthilkumar @ Veerakumar, S/o.Vadivel, Vethiyapa Nadar Compound, Peraiyur Town, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of property ownership dispute. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. injunction not maintainable in title disputes. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. unregistered and insufficiently stamped deeds cannot validate claims. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's ruling on the appeal. (Para 14) |
J U D G M E N T
Heard.
2. This Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree of the first appellate Court / Subordinate Court, Theni in A.S. No.35 of 2019, dated 18.12.2024 which confirmed the judgment and decree of the trial court/District Munsif, Andipatti in O.S.No.12 of 2003, dated 26.07.2019.
3. The appellants, having lost in both the courts below, filed the original suit O.S. No. 12 of 2003 seeking a bare injunction in respect of the immovable property comprised in S.Nos. 817 and 818 total measuring
5 acres and 79 cents.
4. The main contention of the appellants is that the suit property originally belonged to the first defendant, who sold it to the first appellant under an unregistered sale deed dated 05.09.1983 (Ex.A23) for a consideration of Rs.33,000/-. The said sale deed was engrossed on stamp papers worth Rs.2.50 only. The defendants, in their written statement, specifically denied the plaintif
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
