SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65619

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
D. DHATCHANAMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
N. SIVAKUMAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Suit for specific performance or for the alternate relief to refund the advance amount of Rs.20,50,000/- and costs.

2. The suit property owned by the first defendant Elumalai, who purchased the property on 25.03.2011, under a registered sale deed. He entered into an unregistered sale agreement with the plaintiff, Sivakumar on 01.03.2017. The sale consideration was fixed as Rs.23,00,000/- and advance of Rs.20,50,000/- paid on the date of the sale agreement. The parties agreed to complete the transaction within a period of eight months.

3. The plaintiff was ready to tender the balance sale consideration of Rs.2,50,000/- and willing to perform his part of contract. He requested the defendant to receive the balance sale consideration and execute the sale deed. The defendant was evasive. Later, the plaintiff came to know that the first defendant in order to fraud him had entered into a power of attorney in favour of the second defendant, Dhatchnamurthy and Elumalai entered as an agent of the first defendant and created a sale agreement on 27.06.2017 in favour of the third defendant, Dhandapani, immediately he rushed to the Court for the above said relief. The first defendant, owne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top